|   
 1.1 Background
The Earth resides in a swarm of comets and asteroids that
    can, and do, impact its surface. The solar system contains a
    long-lived population of asteroids and comets, some fraction
    of which are perturbed into orbits that cross the orbits of the
    Earth and other planets. Spacecraft exploration of the terrestrial
    planets and the satellites of the outer planets has revealed
    crater-scarred surfaces that testify to a continuing rain of
    impacting projectiles. Additional evidence concerning cosmic
    projectiles in near-Earth space has accumulated since the discovery
    of the first Earth-crossing asteroid nearly sixty years ago,
    and improvements in telescopic search techniques have resulted
    in the discovery of dozens of near-Earth asteroids and short
    period comets each year. The role of impacts in affecting the
    Earth's geological history, its ecosphere, and the evolution
    of life itself has become a major topic of current interdisciplinary
    interest. 
      
        |  |  |  |  
        | FIGURE 1.1. Earth resides in a swarm of
        comets and asteroids, as this series of plots graphically shows:
        (a) the locations of the inner planets an January 1, 1992,
 (b) the orbits of the 100 largest known near-Earth asteroids,
        and (c) composite
 of (a) and (b).
 Art courtesy of R. P. Binzel
 |  Significant attention by the scientific community to the hazard
    began in 1980 when Luis Alvarez and others prposed that such
    an impact, and the resulting global pall of dust, resulted in
    the mass extinctions of lifeforms on Earth, ending the age of
    dinosaurs (Alvarez and others, 1980). Additional papers and discussion
    in the scientific literature followed, and widespread public
    interest was aroused. In 1981, NASA organized a workshop "Collision
    of Asteroids and Comets with the Earth: Physical and Human Consequences"
    at Snowmass, Colorado (July 13-16, 1981). Asummary of the principal
    conclusions of the workshop report appeared in the book Cosmic
    Catastrophes (Chapman and Morrison, 1989a) and in a presentation
    by Chapman and Morrison(1989b) at an American Geophysical Union
    Natural Hazards Symposium. In response to the close passage of
    asteroid 1989FC, the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
    (AIAA, 1990) recommended studies to increase the detection rate
    of near-Earth asteroids, and how to prevent such objects striking
    the Earth. The AIAA brought these recommendations to the attention
    of the House Committee of Science, Space, and Technology, leading
    to the Congressional mandate for this workshop included in the
    NASA 1990 Authorization Bill. In parallel with these political
    developments, a small group of dedicated observers significantly
    increased the discovery rate of Near-Earth asteroids and comets,
    and several of these discoveries were highlighted in the international
    press. Other recent activity has included the 1991 International
    Conference on Near-Earth Asteroids (San Juan Capistrano, California,
    June 30 - July 3), a meeting on the "Asteroid Hazard"
    held in St. Petersburg, Russia (October 9-10, 1991), and a resolution
    endorsing international searches for NEO's adopted by the International
    Astronomical Union (August 1991).
 Despite a widespread perception that asteroid impact is a
    newly recognized hazard, the basic nature of the hazard was roughly
    understood half a century ago. In 1941, Fletcher Watson published
    an estimate of the rate of impacts on the Earth, based on the
    discovery of the first three Earth-approaching asteroids (Apollo,
    Adonis, and Hermes). A few years later, Ralph Baldwin (1949),
    in his seminal book The Face of the Moon, wrote 
      ...since the Moon has always been the companion of the
      Earth, the history of the former is only a paraphrase of the
      history of the latter... [Its mirror on Earth] contains a disturbing
      factor. There is no assurance that these meteoritic impacts have
      all been restricted to the past. Indeed we have positive evidence
      that [sizeable] meteorites and asteroids still abound in space
      and occasionally come close to the Earth. The explosion that
      formed the [lunar] crater Tycho...would, anywhere on Earth, be
      a horrifying thing, almost inconceivable in its monstrosity.
     
      
        |  |  
        | FIGURE 1.2 . An aerial view of Meteor Crater, Arizona, one of the Earth's
        youngest impact craters. Field studies indicate that the crater
        was formed some 50,000 years ago by an iron mass(es) traveling
        in excess of 11 km/s and releasing 10 to 20 megatons of energy.
        The result was the formation of a bowl-shaped crater approximately
        1 km across and over 200 m deep, surrounded by an extensive ejecta
        blanket.
 Photograph courtesy of R.J. Roddy and K.A. Zeller, U.S. Geological
        Survey
 |  Watson and Baldwin (both of whom are still alive) were prescient,
    but in their time few other scientists gave much thought to impacts
    on the Earth. Recently, however, there has been a gestalt shift
    that recognizes extraterrestrial impact as a major geological
    process and, probably, an important influence on the evolution
    of life on our planet. Also new is our capability to detect such
    objects and to develop a space technology that could deflect
    a potential projectile before it struck the Earth.
    
 
 1.2 The International NEO Detection WorkshopThe United States House of Representatives, in its NASA Multiyear
    Authorization Act of 1990 (26 September 1990), included the following
    language: 
      "The Committee believes that it is imperative that
      the detection rate of Earth-orbit-crossing asteroids must be
      increased substantially, and that the means to destroy or alter
      the orbits of asteroids when they threaten collision should be
      defined and agreed upon internationally.
       "The chances of the Earth being struck by a large
      asteroid are extremely small, but since the consequences of such
      a collision are extremely large, the Committee believes it is
      only prudent to assess the nature of the threat and prepare to
      deal with it. We have the technology to detect such asteroids
      and to prevent their collision with the Earth.
       "The Committee therefore directs that NASA undertake
      two workshop studies. The first would define a program for dramatically
      increasing the detection rate of Earth-orbit-crossing asteroids;
      this study would address the costs, schedule, technology, and
      equipment required for precise definition of the orbits of such
      bodies. The second study would define systems and technologies
      to alter the orbits of such asteroids or to destroy them if they
      should pose a danger of life on Earth. The Committee recommends
      international participation in these studies and suggests that
      they be conducted within a year of the passage of this legislation."
     
      
        |  |  
        | FIGURE 1.3. The heavily cratered
        highlands of the Moon record the period of heavy bombardment
        that marked the first 500 million years of lunar history. Photograph courtesy of NASA Johnson Space Center
 |  
 The present report of the NASA International Near-Earth Object
    Detection Workshop is the direct result of this Congressional
    request to NASA. A second NASA workshop on the question of altering
    asteroid orbits is scheduled for 1992. The NASA International Near-Earth Object Detection Workshop
    was organized in the spring of 1991 and held three formal meetings:
    on June 30 - July 3 at the San Juan Capistrano Research Institute,
    on September 24-25 at the NASA Ames Research Center, and on November
    5 in Palo Alto, California. The group has the following membership
    of 24 individuals from four continents. 
      Richard Binzel (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA)
      Edward Bowell (Lowell Observatory, USA)
      Clark Chapman (Planetary Science Institute, USA)
      Louis Friedman (The Planetary Society, USA)
      Tom Gehrels (University of Arizona, USA)
      Eleanor Helin (Caltech/NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USA)
      Brian Marsden (Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
      USA)
      Alain Maury (Observatoire de la Cote d'Azur, France)
      Thomas Morgan (NASA Headquarters, USA)
      David Morrison (NASA Ames Research Center, USA)
      Karri Muinonen (Helsinki University, Finland)
      Steven Ostro (Caltech/NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USA)
      John Pike (Federation of American Scientists, USA)
      Jurgen Rahe (NASA Headquarters, USA)
      R. Rajamohan (Indian Institute of Astrophysics, India)
      John Rather (NASA Headquarters, USA)
      Ken Russell (Anglo-Australian Observatory, Australia)
      Eugene Shoemaker (U.S. Geological Survey, USA)
      Andrej Sokolsky (Institute for Theoretical Astronomy, USSR)
      Duncan Steel (Anglo-Australian Observatory, Australia)
      David Tholen (University of Hawaii, USA)
      Joseph Veverka (Cornell University, USA)
      Faith Vilas (NASA Johnson Space Center, USA)
      Donald Yeomans (Caltech/NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USA)
          
 
 1.3 Approach to the Problem
As described in the following chapters of this report, the
    workshop group has analyzed the nature of the hazard and defined
    a practical program for the detection of potentially catastrophic
    impacts. The greatest risk is from the impact of the largest
    objects -- those with diameters greater than 1 km. Such impacts,
    which occur on average from once to several times per million
    years, are qualitatively as well as quantitatively different
    from any other natural disasters in that their consequences are
    global, affecting the entire planet. How, then, should we approach
    the problem of discovering and tracking these objects?
 
      
        |  |  
        | FIGURE 1.4. Approximately 130
        terrestrial impact craters have been identified. They range up
        to 140 to 200 km in diameter and from recent to about two billion
        years in age. More craters have been identified in Australia,
        North America, and eastern Europe partly because these areas
        have been relatively stable for considerable geologic periods,
        thus preserving the early geologic record, and because active
        search programs have been conducted in these areas. Art courtesy of R.A.F. Grieve, Geological
        Survey of Canada
 |  
 About 90 percent of the potential Earth-impacting projectiles
    are near-Earth asteroids or short-period comets, called collectively
    NEOs (Near Earth Objects). The other 10 percent are intermediate
    or long-period comets (those with periods longer than 20 years),
    which are treated separately since they they spend so little
    time in near-Earth space. The NEOs have orbits that closely approach
    or intersect that of the Earth. Their normal orbital motion brings
    them relatively near the Earth at intervals of a few years, permitting
    their discovery. The objective of an NEO survey is to find these
    objects during their periodic approaches to the Earth, to calculate
    their long-term orbital trajectories, and to identify any that
    may impact the Earth over the next several centuries. If any
    appear to be on Earth-impact trajectories, there will generally
    be a period of at least several decades during which to take
    corrective action. It should be emphasized that we are not discussing
    either a short-range search nor a quick-response defense system.
    The chance that an NEO will be discovered less than a few years
    before impact is vanishingly small. The nature of the NEO orbits
    allows us to carry out a deliberate, comprehensive survey with
    ample time to react if any threatening NEO is found. In contrast,
    however, the warning time for impact from a long-period comet
    might be as short as two years, requiring a different class of
    response. In order to carry out a deliberate and comprehensive search,
    we must detect, over a period of a decade or more, the NEOs larger
    than our 1-km size threshold that pass near the Earth. This requires
    that we monitor a region of space extending outward from the
    orbit of the Earth approximately as far as the inner edge of
    the main asteroid belt, at a distance of 200 million kilometers.
    The easiest way to detect these NEOs is by observing their reflected
    sunlight, although they can also be seen in the infrared using
    their emitted thermal radiation. More exotic technologies are
    not appropriate; radar, in particular, is limited to targets
    close to the Earth, and so is unsuitable to a survey extending
    200 million kilometers into space. In principle, the survey could
    be carried out either from the ground or from orbit. The brightness
    of a 1-km NEO at 200 million kilometers, assuming a reflectivity
    of 3 percent or more, corresponds to stellar magnitude 22. Although
    they are quite faint, such objects are readily detectable with
    conventional ground-based telescopes and can be distinguished
    from background stars by their characteristic motion. Thus there
    is no requirement for a more expensive space-based system. This
    brightness limit also determines the minimum telescope aperture
    of about 2 m that is required for a complete survey. Thus we
    have it within our current capability to construct a network
    of survey telescopes at relatively modest cost that can discover
    and track essentially all of the NEOs greater than 1 km in diameter.
    In addition, this same network of optical survey telescopes will
    be capable of detecting most incoming intermediate- or long-period
    comets and determining if any of them is has the potential to
    strike the Earth. However, the time between detection and possible
    impact will be much shorter for the long-period comets, probably
    no more than two years. The survey program described in this report has the potential
    to alter fundamentally the way we view the threat of cosmic impacts.
    To date we have talked about a relatively undefined threat, to
    be discussed in terms of probabilities or statistical risks.
    While we know that such impacts must take place from time to
    time, we do not know if there are any specific bodies in space
    might impact the Earth over the next few centuries. If this search
    program is carried out, however, we can answer this question
    to at least the 75 percent confidence level. If such an object
    is found, then we can turn our attention to dealing with the
    threat it poses. In other words, we have the capability for at
    least a 75 percent reduction in the hazard posed by cosmic impacts.   |